so i got to thinking after my last post about reading and suddenly recalled a funny feeling a got a month or so ago. i was in the process of reading/skimming some books i had checked out of the library and they triggered some kind of flashback which launched me into a hunt for an article i had read years ago somewhere else. i eventually found it, picked it up, read that for a bit and that in turn triggered some other connection, which got me rooting through my drawers and such, looking for another book.
at one point i realized that i was beginning to read like how i browse the internet. and as soon as i realized that, i had no idea what to make of it. i suppose with the non-digital books (or just “books”), the only hyperlink is the one you make yourself across texts. i find it strange that my brain has just become attuned to this; has somehow cognitively morphed itself in this way, which makes it hard to “delink” sometimes. i would like to be able to get through the reading without my brain firing off into a multitude of directions.
Filed under: connections
i just ran across this site and love it to death. it’s called justcurio.us and is a site that let’s you submit any kind of question where strangers than can answer. the questions range from the banal, to the absurd, and touching. there is something very poetic about these brief instances of virtual encounter. it kinda reminds me learningtoloveyou more in the way that the art assignments are just thrown out to the world to see who will respond.
so here is the first post of my blog. i feel like a lemming, but i felt compelled to write only because as my brain has been churning quite heftily for the past several months and i’ve been thinking really hard as i embark on grad school for the fall. one common theme that has come up in various ways is this whole concept of connection and connections. as a part of my work, my interest in information culture and digital life centers this whole idea about the ways that we are connected to one another. i mean, really when you look at it: how are we really connected to one another? what are the links and relationships that bind us to one another? and how important is it to feel connected? and what the hell does the "interweb" have to do with any of this to begin with?
i keep returning to this notion of "information culture" and while i haven’t been able to define it clearly in my own head, i do think this idea is important as it focuses the attention on people’s everyday lives, rather than the banner waving of political life. don’t get me wrong, political life is important. but in terms of trying to understand the deeper sense of connection that people have to one another, i think this takes place more as part of their domestic life rather than their public/political life. and there are certainly debates around the public life and public good that explore what it means to be connected in the public sphere. nevertheless, connection in this private space is what i think needs to be looked at more closely in relation all this internet mumbo jumbo.
i used to think about this in terms of communties, but recently i’ve been really rethinking this whole community metaphor. there already has been a lot of work into the changing nature of community in online environments. peep berry wellman’s work here. or danah boyd’s here. but starting with community assumes connection to begin with, and i just have this suspicion that things look at lot different if you refocus and look at individuals first. the whole networked community metaphor already obliterates the rendition of community of a cohesive and integrated unit. instead it emphasizes the nodal qualities of social connection and i think i want to push this idea and see where it takes me. what this translates to exactly, i’m not sure.
